Protocol analysis

API reverse engineering services

When no official interface covers the action, first decide whether authorized protocol analysis can restore it — then build an adapter or keep the step manual. The output has to be maintainable, not a one-off capture.

When

When protocol work makes sense

Not every integration needs it. Where an official API exists, protocol analysis is a fallback, not the default.

01 / Case

No official coverage

The open platform has no equivalent capability, or its fields and limits do not fit the workflow. Assess authorized protocol work before building.

02 / Case

Legacy without docs

An internal or partner system is still in use but its interface notes are lost. Turn the actual fields and state flow into maintainable documentation.

03 / Case

Client releases change

Fields, authentication or flows shift with a version and the integration breaks. Locate the difference and add an adapter instead of waiting for an outage.

04 / Case

Stable fields downstream

CRM, BI or ticketing needs fixed fields and error codes. Convert the analysis into a stable interface contract before handover.

Deliverables

What the analysis delivers

The goal is not a single successful call. Someone else must be able to see where fields come from, how failures surface and what to change after a platform update.

Field and layering notes live in engineering; stages and acceptance are in the delivery process.

Interface inventory and call sequence
Request and response field dictionary
Authentication and signing notes within authorization
Error codes and state transitions
Integration samples and replay records
Version change and maintenance agreement
Boundaries

Boundaries, stated up front

These do not loosen with project size. Better to agree them before the contract than explain afterwards.

Authorized scope

Interfaces the account owner has authorized for their own business only; sources and purposes we cannot verify are declined.

No credentials

No stored passwords, no device-fingerprint emulation and no CAPTCHA handling.

No control bypass

No proxy pools or automation to get around platform limits; request rates follow business need and source capacity.

No permanent promise

Platform updates and encryption changes are maintained within scope; major changes are estimated separately.

For collection work see scraping and data collection; platform account limits are in compliance.

Process

Five steps from analysis to handover

Every step has an output and scope is confirmed before work starts. Unknowns stay marked as open, not written up as delivered.

Step 01

Scope

Target actions, account ownership, client version, data purpose and which steps must stay manual.

Step 02

Protocol analysis

Capture samples inside the authorized account: requests, responses, authentication and failure branches. No destructive testing.

Step 03

Field documentation

Produce the field dictionary, sequence diagrams and error codes. Mark open questions instead of guessing.

Step 04

Adapter build

Implement the adapter the business needs, with retries, timeouts, fallbacks and version differences handled.

Step 05

Integration & handover

Regress against agreed samples; deliver source, docs and integration records, and state the maintenance boundary.

FAQ

API reverse engineering FAQ

Where is the line between protocol analysis and unauthorized scraping?

Authorization, purpose and whether security controls are bypassed. We analyze interfaces the account owner has authorized for their own business, and do not touch credentials, emulate devices, handle CAPTCHAs, bypass platform controls or bulk-collect unauthorized content.

Could this breach platform terms?

It depends on the platform agreement and the authorization in place. We ask for the business purpose and account ownership in writing and decline work that requires control bypass or unauthorized data. This is not legal advice; confirm the terms before signing.

Do we need this if an official API exists?

Use the official API first: stable, documented and auditable. Protocol work is assessed only where the official capability falls short and authorization allows it, with maintenance cost included.

What happens after a platform update?

Within the maintenance scope we locate the difference and adapt fields and flows. Changes to encryption, login state or a removed capability are major changes, estimated separately. We do not promise permanent availability.

Is source code included?

Yes: adapter source, field documentation, sequence notes and integration records. Deployment and run notes follow the agreed scope; platform accounts and credentials stay with you.

Confirm feasibility before method

Tell us the target action, account ownership and client version. We decide whether the official API is enough and state the analysis and maintenance boundary.